Florence Easton
Florence Easton claims a place of honor in the annals of opera. Few sopranos have sung a wider repertory. Only a handful can match her uncompromising musicianship. None surpasses her ability to learn a role and perform it within hours. Although colleagues and critics alike esteemed her artistry, few today rank Easton among the vocal elite. During thirteen seasons at the Metropolitan Opera, she competed with the most important sopranos of the day but was invariably eclipsed by her renowned rivals. Easton and Rosa Ponselle shared Gioconda and Santuzza, but Ponselle set the standard. Easton and Claudia Muzio both sang Maddalena, Leonora and Tosca, but Muzio stirred a stronger response from audiences. Both Easton and Elisabeth Rethberg performed Aida in 1922. Easton sang the role once. Rethberg went on to portray the Ethiopian princess sixty-eight times. For all her uncompromising professionalism and keen intelligence, Easton lacked the bold interpretive face her rivals stamped on the roles they shared.
Eastons recordingslike her stage performancesinspire admiration but not deep affection. The singing, honest and accurate, is marred by no vocal or interpretive blemish. The voice is beautifully schooled, admirable in its evenness throughout an extended range. But the urgent surge of emotion one hears, say, in Ponselles Leonora or Muzios Violetta or Tosca is missing from these exemplary discs. Unlike Muzio or Ponselle, who swept audiences into their vocal embrace, Easton sounds like a starchy aunt holding the listener at arms length. Her pearly-toned O mio babbino carotouching for its restraintmust be the most straight-laced on record. And yet, after an evening spent with Eastons recordings, admiration turns to profound respect. Throughout a broad repertory, Easton sings with unfailing taste and magisterial vocal control. The line unfolds seamlessly. The voice, shining and lustrous, flows without break from a full lower range right up to secure high B flats and Cs. Florence Eastonon record at leastranks as one of the great singers.
In one respectthe breadth of her repertoryEaston surpassed all rivals. During her career, she sang eighty-eight rolessome in three languagesand prepared another thirty for performance. She mastered the Italian repertory, from Gilda to Gioconda, from Lauretta to Turandot. Easton was celebrated as Isolde, Kundry and Brünnhilde but also sang Elektra, Salome, Goldmarks Queen of Sheba, dAlberts Myrtocle and Kienzls Martha. Easton was also a magnificent Mozarteanher Fiordiligi was acclaimed by critics in the Mets first Cosí fan tutteand she was an admired interpreter of French roles, from Mignon and Marguerite to Rachel, Valentine and both Carmen and Micaëla. In the range and variety of roles she masteredand performed in major opera houses from Chicago and New York on to London, Hamburg and BerlinEaston rivals the legendary Lilli Lehmann and Lillian Nordica. No wonder Caruso said Eastons head was a music box. She takes off the lid, takes out one record and puts in another.
Despite her astonishing versatility, Easton draws measured comments from most vocal critics. J. B. Steane calls her a musicianly soprano. Michael Scott refers to Easton as a singer of classical virtues. Neatly summing up Eastons artistry, Peter G. Davis writes, She adapted her voice and technique to so many different roles so successfully that she is remembered for none of them. American critic Oscar Thompson put her art in perspective when he wrote, Mme. Eastons was not one of the really great voices, though a very good one which she often used with the most telling effect. Neither was hers an electrical personality. A certain seriousness of purpose obtruded on occasions in her impersonations in a manner to suggest the most conscientious application rather than the kindling of inspiration.
Easton used a blunter word than application or inspiration to describe how she mastered such a large repertory. Work, young manwork, work! shot back the soprano to a writer from Musical America who inquired how she learned so many roles. That question came up frequently in interviews. Eastons response reveals much about this ambitious, hard-working artist. If I were a baseball fan, she continued, I should know batting averages. Being an opera singer, I turn my attention to memorizing operas.
To continue the baseball metaphor, Easton was Giulio Gatti-Casazzas dream pinch hitter. Countless Met performances were brought to winning conclusions by Eastons willingness to go to bat for an indisposed colleague. When Muzio fell ill in 1919 after the premiere of LAmore dei tre re, Easton learned the role in barely ten hours and sang it without a stage rehearsal. In three days during the 192021 season, Easton replaced both Farrar and Ponselle. She sang Carmen in Frenchpreviously she had sung the role in German and Englishand then undertook her first Rezia on a few hours notice. Feats like that were commonplace during Eastons Met career.
Nerves of steel were as indispensable for Eastons success as intelligence, stamina and hard work. Few people realize the strain under which an opera singer is placed, noted Easton. She often referred to the physical energy singing requires and said she spent the day of a performance in bed and, if possible, the day before and after. During her thirteen Met seasonsthe undoubted high point of Eastons careershe sang 354 performances of forty-two roles in thirty-nine operas. Contracts invariably required her to prepare as many as thirty-one different roles in a single season.
The stress and strain took their toll even on this hard-working and determined artist. Apparently Easton decided to leave the Met after looking out at the audience during a performance and realizing she didnt know what opera she was singing or the words and notes. In a letter to Giulio Gatti-Casazza dated 29 April 1929, Easton wrote, I am sorry to have to inform you that for reasons of ill health, I cannot fulfill my contract with the Metropolitan Opera for the coming season. The doctors have ordered me to take an absolute rest. She was forty-six.
Three countries claim Florence Easton. Born in England, she grew up in Canada and, after marrying American tenor Francis Maclennan, became a U.S. citizen. Five years after her birth in Middlesbrough-on-Tees, 25 October 1882, Easton was taken by her parents to Toronto, where she spent her childhood. Little is known about this period of her life, but two eventsserious illness and the death of her motherscarred her youth and must have steeled her determination to succeed. The Metropolitan Opera Archives contain an article written by Alice Booth for an unidentified magazine. The author states in her childhood Easton became violently ill and underwent an operation that left her body in a splint. Booth records the child had no skating, no dancing, no swimming...books and music only. In another cutting from an unnamed magazine in the clipping files of the New York Public Library, Alice Scott writes, Although not one in ten thousand in her audiences know(s) it, she has gone through life slightly crippled.
After the death of her mother, Easton accompanied her father back to England where she joined her grandparents in Yorkshire. Florence began to study the piano and organ, although she could not pedal because her foot was still in a brace. At sixteen, she learned how to walk again after the brace finally came off. When her father asked what she wanted, Florence demanded to have her voice really well trained. In 1899, she was sent to London to study both piano and voice at the Royal College of Music. At this point, Easton, as she later recalled, wanted to become a good ballad singer. After a year, Eastons father took her to France to study with his friend, Elliot Haslam, an English coach working in Paris. A year later, the death of her father forced Easton to return to her grandparents home. By then she had set her sights on an operatic career.
After auditioning for the Moody-Manners Company, she was told to learn several small parts. Eastons disapproving grandmother refused to allow her granddaughter to sing operatic music in her house. The resourceful Florence visited relatives and practiced the roles in one home after another. In the fall of 1903, she returned to London and won a place in the Moody-Manners opera company which toured the English provinces. She made her debut in Newcastle as the Shepherd in Tannhäuser and then, during the companys season at Covent Garden, she sang Stephano in Roméo et Juliette. Maclennan was also a member of the company. They wed in the spring of 1904. A year later, she accompanied her husband to the U.S. where they both joined the Savage Opera Company. Maclennan claimed the title role in Parsifal. By now, Easton was singing leading roles. In November 1905, her American debut as Gilda in Boston attracted an enthusiastic review from H.T. Parker, who commented on her voice of girlish musing and girlish romance. She then took on Marguerite in Faust and in the next season shared the title role in Madama Butterfly with two other sopranos in the touring production that introduced Puccinis opera to America.
By 1906, Easton had already revealed her defining characteristicskeen ambition and the ability to sing a wide range of roles. Both qualities emerged when she and her husband traveled to Berlin, where Maclennan had a contract with the Court Opera. The couple realized they could not make important careers in the U.S. without honing their talent on foreign stages. We told ourselves the truth, that we were not even half equipped for our trade, later recalled the soprano. So we forgot our press notices, humbled our pride, sent our baby to his grandmother in Canada, and set out for Europe.
Maclennan was engaged for leading roles in Berlin. His wife joined the company when, not for the last time, she seized opportunity. Easton was offered Marguerite if she could relearn the role in German in a week. She did. Karl Muck later claimed he could give Easton a score at eight a.m., and she would be ready to perform the role by the evening. After singing Carmen and Butterfly, she was asked to replace Emmy Destinn as Aida. Easton had never sung the role but took the chance, unaware Kaiser Wilhelm and his court were attending the performance. She learned the role in two days and sang it without a stage rehearsal. After the performance, the Kaiser asked Easton why she was not singing regularly in his company. I am waiting to be asked, she replied. Easton received a five-year contract the next day.
Between 1908 and 1913, Easton and Maclennan based their careers in Berlin. Maclennan was the star in the family. He appeared in a new production of Madama Butterfly with Geraldine Farrar while his wife had a small part in a new production of von Rezniceks Donna Diana. He sang Roméo in a new production of Roméo et Juliette, but Easton was cast as the First Boy in Die Zauberflöte. Easton claimed important rolesshe followed Farrar in Butterfly and Claire Dux as Sophiebut only after other sopranos sang the premiere. In 1909, Easton and her husband appeared at Covent Garden in Naylors The Angelus and Madama Butterfly. Achieving her ambition to take on dramatic roles, Easton then toured with the Denhof Grand Opera as Sieglinde, Gutrune and Elektra.
The Hamburg Stadt-Theater offered the couple a contract for the 191314 season. They continued to make guest appearances in Berlin but assumed leading roles in Hamburg. Easton displayed her versatility as Nedda and Santuzza, Senta and Minnie (with Caruso), Gutrune and Valentine, Myrtocle, Eva and Martha in Der Evangelimann. At the outbreak of the war, Easton and her husband were able to remain in Germany through the intervention of the Kaiser. In 1915, they made the first of two trips to the U.S. to appear in Chicago. In a letter of commendation to Cleofante Campanini, Richard Strauss called Easton a gifted artist, a magnificent interpreter and judged her the best Elektra, Salome and Sophie. In Chicago, Maclennan sang Wagner roles, but Easton was content with a single Siegfried Brünnhilde. A year later she repeated Brünnhilde and also sang Gutrune, Butterfly and Nedda.
U.S. intervention in the war forced the couple to shift the focus of their careers back to America. They both auditioned for the Met in 1917. Maclennan was not hired, but Easton was taken as a replacement for Johanna Gadski. Easton was engaged for thirty performances over five and one-half months for a fee of $10,500. She was responsible for twenty German roles, eight Italian and three French that covered the soprano spectrum. Although unwell, she drew favorable reviews for her debut as Santuzza on 7 December 1917. She achieved star status after singing the title role in the first Metropolitan Opera premiere of Liszts Die Legende von der heiligen Elisabeth. Easton quickly became an indispensable member of the Mets roster. Her performance fee rose from $350 in the first season to $900 in her last. Year by year, she claimed a broader part of the repertory.
Easton was a popular interviewee during her first seasons at the Met. Journalists sometimes found the industrious soprano knitting socks or hemming curtains for the Maclennans house on Long Island. Although she suffered personal lossthe death of her daughter, Wilhelmina, during the influenza epidemic of 1919 and the subsequent dissolution of her marriageEaston never revealed her emotions to the press. She was a stalwart trouper who dedicated her life to singing.
During Eastons Met years, she sang at the Ravinia Festival and toured the U.S. in the Scotti Grand Opera Company. She made her Ravinia debut on 28 June 1919 as Ah-Yoe in LOracolo and also sang Aida, Santuzza, Mimì, Butterfly, Tosca, Susanna in Il Segreto di Susanna, Fiora, Nedda. In the next five years, she returned regularly to Ravinia. To her list of roles, she added Zazà, Elsa, Marguerite, Maddalena, Fedora and Leonora in Il Trovatore. Easton also fulfilled engagements with the New York Philharmonic, Boston Symphony and other American orchestras. And of course, she continued to save performances. During a visit to London in 1927, she was pressed into service to replace Bianca Scacciati, who had failed as Turandot in the British premiere of Puccinis opera.
A year after leaving the Met, Easton returned to Berlin for a gala concert with the Berlin Philharmonic. She was greeted ecstatically by the audience and critics. The former fine, sensitive soprano, one of the most beautiful ever to sing at the Berlin Operacomparable with Farrar, Dux and othershas now developed into one of the truly great voices, full of the most beautiful radiantly glorious tone quality. . . The audience gave Easton a tumultuous reception, wrote one critic. Another praised the enchanting timbre of this clear, utterly pure voice, her flexible technique and fine phrasing.
Easton, like other stars, lost much of her money in the stock market crash of 1929. Now divorced from Maclennan, she remarried in 1931. With her husband, business executive Stanley Roberts, Easton moved to England in the following year. In the next three seasons, Easton returned to Covent Garden for Siegfried with Melchior and sang Tosca and Carmen in Birmingham and Tosca at Sadlers Wells. She also sang in orchestra concerts and recitals. A return to New York launched her recital career in the U.S. during the winter of 193435. A year later, she came back to the Met for her final performance on the opera stage as the Walküre Brünnhilde. Easton triumphed in front of an audience packed with many of her former Met colleagues. For the next several years, she continued to sing recitals and make radio broadcasts. Her final appearance took place in a Town Hall recital on 6 December 1943. After the war, Easton moved to Montreal with her husband who was transferred there by the Celanese Corporation of America. She taught and then returned to New York in 1950. Five years later, she died.
After her Met debut, Easton recorded frequently for Aeolian-Vocalion, Brunswick and Edison. These recordings document her voice but not her repertory. The short duration of the 78 rpm record forced Easton to concentrate on popular songs and arias. There is a creators recording of O mio babbino caro but where are Fiordiligis Come scoglio or Rezias Ocean, thou mighty monster? Easton was a notable Strauss soprano, but we know that only from reviews. Her Elektra, Salome and Marschallin, admired by the composer, are not documented on disc.
Marstons remasteringsespecially the electric Edisonsreveal a warmth to the tone, missing in previous LP and CD transfers of Eastons voice. These recordings should win new admirers and remind faithful fans what a superb singer Easton was. Consistency is the byword for Eastons records. One listens in vain for a pinched high note, an off-centered attack, the hint of a wobble or an ill-focused tone. Dependable? Yes. Well-schooled? Always. But there is more, much more. Easton molds a severe vocal line. She uses portamento sparingly and indulges in none of the sudden rinforzamenti and sobs typical of the verismo soprano. Her Pace, pace is magnificent. True, the tone doesnt expand like Ponselles and, unlike Muzio, she draws the line without much chiaroscuro. But what soprano sings more fluently or takes the intervals so cleanly? At the climax, Easton jumps up to a dolce high B flat.
The Butterfly ariaswhether heard in acoustic or electrical versionsdocument one of Eastons important roles. They show the security and ease of her singing, especially in the middle and lower-middle range which sound full and focused. There is tension in the top tones but no strain. The clean, accurate singing never loses its poise. In the Jewel Song from Faust, Easton displays a neat trill, shapely runs and fluent divisions. All thats missing is the sparkling verve some interpreters bring to this music. Eastons Habanera may lack seductive languor and teasing grace, but her smoothly sung version is not without insinuating charm. Il est doux appears to have been a great favorite of the soprano. The classical proportions of her singing add stature to Massenets music. Easton infuses Mignons Connais-tu le pays with tender wistfulness through the scrupulous accuracy of her singing.
There are a few surprises. In both Bohème arias, Easton sings with nice tonal shading and delicate accents. Her Donde lieta usci is affecting. Outstanding are Eastons versions of Micaëlas Aria and Neddas Ballatella. In both, her voice leaps eagerly on the notes with keen attack and vibrant tone. A pair of Mexican songs, in contrast, sound rather earthbound, lacking in verbal tang and rhythmic energy. They display the imperturbable placidity Steane notes in her singing. Like many a soprano, she sounds more textually alert and communicative when singing in her own language. Easton, after all, was a great champion of opera and song in the vernacular. Holy Night, O Divine Redeemer and arias from Sadko and The Snow Maiden show how communicative Easton could be in her native language.
Eastons recordings may not set the pulse racing with excitement, but they enshrine the classical virtues of great singing. All the hallmarks of vocal artimmaculate tone, clean attack, seamless legato, smooth dynamic control, clear dictioncan be heard in almost every record she made. Do these recordings reveal a unique and unforgettable interpreter? Every listener must answer that question for himself. They unquestionably document the achievement of a soprano who set a standard for aristocratic musicianship and polished artistry. They form the musical legacy of one of the great singers of the 20th century.
© Robert Baxter, 2001
|